Atlantic City hotels defeat latest class action over casino room rates
By Mike Scarcella
Oct 1 (Reuters) -Major casino-hotel operators in Atlantic City including Caesars Entertainment and MGM Resorts have persuaded a U.S. judge to dismiss a proposed consumer class action accusing them and a revenue management platform of overcharging for room rentals.
U.S. District Judge Karen Williams in Camden, New Jersey, ruled on Tuesday that the consumers had failed to present enough evidence to let their price-fixing lawsuit move ahead.
Williams dismissed the consumers’ lawsuit with prejudice, meaning it cannot be filed again. The case was part of a wave of new lawsuits claiming the use of revenue management platforms that rely on rivals' data can be deemed price-fixing.
The judge’s ruling marked a second setback for plaintiffs claiming that major hotels schemed to artificially jack up room rates. Consumers in a related case have appealed a Nevada federal judge’s order dismissing their lawsuit against Wynn Resorts, Caesars and others.
In both cases, the plaintiffs alleged hotel owners fed sensitive internal information — such as real-time price and occupancy data — to a shared software platform that offered pricing recommendations.
The hotels and the software maker, Cendyn, which was also a defendant, have denied any wrongdoing.
Representatives from Cendyn, Caesars Entertainment, MGM Resorts and Hard Rock on Tuesday did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment.
The plaintiffs’ attorneys in the New Jersey case at law firms Lite DePalma Greenberg & Afanador; Burns Charest; and Susman Godfrey did not immediately respond to a similar request.
The consumers said in their lawsuit that the hotels used Cendyn’s “Rainmaker” software “as their shared pricing brain” that “does all the hard work for them.”
They said “while the AI-driven technology at issue may be fairly novel, the underlying conduct is not.”
Cendyn and the hotels countered that there was no direct or circumstantial evidence that the defendants agreed to fix prices. They also said the hotels were not required to accept the software’s pricing recommendations.
Williams concluded the plaintiffs failed to show how the hotels used the allegedly confidential data after it was provided to Cendyn. That missing detail, the court said, makes the consumers’ case “factually and legally incomplete.”
Given that the individual hotels could and did set their own rates, it was "implausible that they tacitly agreed to anything, much less to fix the prices of their hotel rooms,”Williams wrote.
The case is Cornish-Adebiyi v. Caesars Entertainment, U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 1:23-cv-02536.
For plaintiffs: Vineet Bhatia and Stephen Morrissey of Susman Godfrey; and Warren Burns and Christopher Cormier of Burns Charest
For Cendyn: Sadik Huseny and Anna Rathbun of Latham & Watkins
For Caesars: Boris Bershteyn and Ken Schwartz of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
For MGM: Harry Rimm of Womble Bond Dickinson; Bethany Kristovich and Justin Raphael of Munger, Tolles & Olson
For Hard Rock: Jennifer Del Medico and David Kiernan of Jones Day
Read more:
Consumers seek second chance in Las Vegas hotel price-fixing lawsuit
CoStar, hotels slam consumers' ‘fanciful’ room pricing lawsuit
Las Vegas hotels defeat price-fixing class action over room rates
Atlantic City casino-hotels accused in scheme to boost room rates
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
