Baseball-MLB players union sues DraftKings, FanDuel over use of names, likenesses
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK, Sept 16 (Reuters) -Major League Baseball's players union sued DraftKings DKNG.O and FanDuel FLTRF.L on Monday, accusing the sports betting companies and two others of using the names and likenesses of hundreds of players on their platforms without permission.
Players are seeking compensatory and punitive damages from DraftKings and Britain's bet365 Group in Philadelphia federal court, and from FanDuel and Brooklyn-based Underdog Fantasy in a New York state court in Manhattan.
Calling online sports betting "big business," MLB players accused the defendants of "flagrant" violations of state laws protecting the right of publicity, saying nearly every active player's image appears on their websites and mobile apps.
"For professional athletes, the ability to control the commercial use of their names, images, and likenesses is a crucial return on their substantial career investment," the players said.
Keeping such control also helps players avoid being perceived as supportive of companies and products they dislike, the players added.
DraftKings, FanDuel and Underdog did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Bet365 could not immediately be reached after business hours. The players' lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for additional comment.
Monday's lawsuits were filed three weeks after the National Football League players union, represented by the same law firm as the MLB players, sued DraftKings for refusing to pay for using NFL player likenesses on so-called non-fungible tokens.
In Monday's complaints, the MLB players said the defendants don't use NFL player likenesses on their platforms.
They said the only reason to treat baseball players differently was to increase "consumer appeal" and draw more bets, given that the "core information" that bettors need is statistical data, not what players look like.
Users, for example, could bet that the Philadelphia Phillies' Bryce Harper or New York Mets' Pete Alonso will hit more than two home runs in a given game, without seeing each player's "valuable image," the complaints said.
The cases are MLB Players Inc v DraftKings Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 24-04884; and MLB Players Inc v. Underdog Sports Inc et al, New York State Supreme Court, New York County.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by Jonathan Oatis
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
