Britain's Rightmove rejects $7.3 bln takeover offer from Murdoch's REA Group
Adds Rightmove response in paragraphs 1-3, updates REA share move in paragraph 4
By Scott Murdoch and Aaditya GovindRao
SYDNEY, Sept 11 (Reuters) -Britain's largest real estate portal Rightmove RMV.L rejected the 5.6 billion pound ($7.32 billion) cash-and-stock takeoverproposal from Australia's REA Group REA.AX, it said on Wednesday, citing that the bid undervalued its prospects.
"The board carefully considered the proposal... and concluded that it was wholly opportunistic and fundamentally undervalued Rightmove and its future prospects," the FTSE 100 .FTSE-listed Rightmove said in a statement.
Rightmove said the board unanimously rejected the proposal.
Shares in REA, which is 62% owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp NWSA.O, fell 2.5%.
Britain's housing market is considered triple the size of Australia's, according to Jefferies analysts, and a deal would have allowed REA to expedite growth in lucrative international markets.
The Australian company had offered to pay a total of 705 pence per Rightmove share, representing a premium of 27% to the British company's closing price of 556 pence on Aug. 30, after which REA confirmed discussions.
The offer consisted of 305 pence in cash and 0.0381 new REA shares and was non-binding and subject to due diligence.
REA said had a deal been completed, Rightmove shareholders would have owned about 18.6% of the combined group.
The cash component of the deal was due to be funded by debt and existing cash, REA said.
Analysts estimated REA would need to issue about 30 million new shares for the stock portion of the deal, which could lower News Corp's holding down to about 50% of REA.
"If it wants to continue to pursue the deal, REA’s options now are to present the offer directly to Rightmove shareholders without board endorsement," said E&P analyst Entcho Raykovski.
REA could sweeten the deal by increasing the cash component, though that could require a capital raising, he said.
"We see merit in the deal but wouldn't want to see REA increase the price to a level where the financial metrics are no longer attractive," Raykovski added.
REA said it would look to apply for a secondary listing in London regardless of whether the deal proceeded to give it access to a wider pool of investors.
($1 = 0.7645 pounds)
Reporting by Scott Murdoch in Sydney and Aaditya Govind Rao, Archishma Iyer and Aby Jose Koilparambil in Bengaluru; Editing by Alan Barona, Muralikumar Anantharaman and Louise Heavens
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
