Citgo auction in jeopardy as Venezuela bondholders pursue parallel claims
New claims threaten Delaware court's ranking for payments
Siemens, Gramercy lawsuits could upend 7-year-long case
Elliott affiliate Amber ties Citgo bid to barring new lawsuits
By Marianna Parraga
HOUSTON, Oct 9 (Reuters) -Holders of billions of dollars in Venezuelan bonds and notes have emerged as last-minute protagonists in a U.S. court case set to decide the ownership of oil refiner Citgo Petroleum, threatening to derail an auction to compensate more than a dozen companies for unpaid debts and expropriations by the country.
At least two groups of holders have resorted to other U.S. courts to enforce their claims, pursuing the same Citgo assets that industrial conglomerates, mining and oil firms have been pursuing for years.
The court cases, designed to circumvent the court's priority in payouts, have added new delays to a 7-year-long case and increased uncertainty over which company best positioned to take over the seventh-largest U.S. refiner.
The new lawsuits last month motivated Elliott Investment Management affiliate Amber Energy to impose conditions to its $7.3 billion offer for Citgo's parent, PDV Holding, making it a highly uncertain bid. PDV Holding's only asset is Citgo's 807,000-barrel-per-day refining network and linked facilities.
If the Delaware court handling the auction cannot block the rival claims, the Elliott affiliate's offer can be withdrawn in days, throwing the auction into chaos.
WHO IS FIRST?
Holders led by Gramercy Distressed Opportunity Fund want to have the Delaware court prioritize their payments, which would cut the potential proceeds from the share auction available to other creditors, leaving a large number of them empty-handed.
Creditors including oil giant ConocoPhillips COP.N, Gold Reserve GRZ.V and miner Crystallex, which brought the original case that found Citgo's parent liable for Venezuela's debts, have opposed allowing the bondholders to jump the line.
If the Gramercy claims are not barred, they could dash the court's carefully constructed 'first come, first serve' priority order that begins with Crystallex, Tidewater TDW.N, ConocoPhillips, O-I Glass OI.N and Huntington Ingalls HII.N.
Citgo, Venezuela's crown jewel of foreign assets, has been valued up to $13 billion as part of the auction while claims against those shares total $21.3 billion. Venezuela's external debt, which remains largely unpaid, is about $150 billion.
CAN THE BONDHOLDERS BE STOPPED?
Robert Pincus, the court officer managing the auction, has requested the judge block creditors already participating in the sale process from resorting to other courts.
Judge Leonard Stark is expected to make a decision soon, which could be challenged, further delaying the sale or forcing the court officer to start negotiations with another bidder, or ultimately scrap the auction.
Another group of creditors, the holders of bonds collateralized with Citgo equity, also could be prioritized. They have not won their court cases about the bonds' validity, but Stark this year approved a motion to include payment provisions as part of bids, which granted them a place in the deliberations.
Pincus failed to reach a payment agreement with these holders as part of the bid negotiation on the deadline set by the court. Because of the many obstacles in the middle, Elliott affiliate's offer has not been confirmed by the judge and the process' deadlines will not be enforced until a new schedule is approved, Stark said last month.
WHAT ARE OTHER CREDITORS DOING?
Several creditors have told the judge they could follow Gramercy's strategy and file parallel lawsuits if Stark does not block the holders from resorting to other courts.
Siemens Energy this month filed a similar lawsuit in a Texas court seeking to recoup about $200 million from a promissory note unpaid by Citgo's ultimate parent, state company PDVSA.
Creditors that do not hold Venezuelan bonds or notes and lawyers representing Venezuela have criticized the negotiation between Pincus and Amber Energy, arguing it lacks transparency and the bid's amount is too low to even cover the first claims in line.
They will be granted time to file objections to the offer and to the process once a new calendar is approved, likely postponing the case's final hearing to early 2025, the judge said.
Creditors cleared to take part in Citgo parent's share auction https://tmsnrt.rs/3vKQglY
US extends license protecting Citgo through Nov, Treasury says ID:nL1N3JZ0JR
Court in Citgo auction needs more time to conclude talks, filing says ID:nL1N3JO049
Weak bids in Citgo auction spurs Venezuela to pitch alternative pay plan ID:nL2N3FM1IE
US court delays selection of bids in Citgo share auction, filing says ID:nL1N3JO0VO
Reporting by Marianna Parraga
Editing by Nick Zieminski
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
