COP29 climate agenda clouded by trade tensions ahead of summit
By Kate Abnett and Tim Cocks
BRUSSELS/JOHANNSEBURG, Nov 8 (Reuters) -China has put trade talks onto the proposed agenda for the COP29 summit, a U.N. document showed, raising the prospect that the issue could disrupt the start of global climate talks.
The draft agenda for this year's climate summit, published on Friday, includes a Chinese proposal, previously reported by Reuters, for talks on carbon border taxes and other "restrictive trade measures" that Beijing says hurt developing countries.
Delegates at the conference must adopt the summit agenda by consensus as their first task when the COP29 talks begin on Nov. 11 in Baku, Azerbaijan.
But some diplomats said the European Union is likely to oppose the Chinese proposal.
Failure to approve the agenda could delay the start of negotiations - cutting into the time left for the main task of approving potentially hundreds of billions of dollars in new funding to address climate change.
China submitted the trade talks proposal on behalf of the BASIC group, which also includes Brazil, India and South Africa.
"We will speak about it, relentlessly," South Africa's Environment Minister Dion George told Reuters.
George said BASIC countries believe the U.N. talks is the appropriate forum in which to discuss climate-related trade policies, including the EU's carbon border levy.
BASIC countries have been strong critics of the EU carbon border policy, which from 2026 will impose fees on imports of high-carbon goods, including steel and cement.
"We are displeased about it and we don't think it's good for our economy," George said, adding that South Africa and China are having "intense conversations" with the EU.
A European Commission spokesperson declined to comment.
The EU has previously said disputes over trade should be addressed at the World Trade Organization.
One European negotiator told Reuters that it had "always been a no-go" to discuss trade measures such as carbon border levies at U.N. climate summits.
The negotiator expressed concern that the BASIC proposal was intended to prevent discussions at COP29 on cutting CO2 emissions and finance from moving forward.
A fight over the agenda at a round of U.N. climate negotiations in 2023 did not get resolved for more than a week, effectively killing off progress at the talks.
Reporting by Kate Abnett in Brussels and Tim Cocks in Johannesburg; Editing by Alexander Smith
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
