Fed Bowman's dissent is first from Fed governor since 2005
WASHINGTON, Sept 18 (Reuters) -Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman on Wednesday became the first Fed governor to vote against an interest-rate decision by the U.S. central bank since 2005, denying Fed Chair Jerome Powell a clear consensus at a pivotal moment.
The Fed's other 11 voting members all cast their ballots in support of reducing the Fed's policy rate by half apercentage point. Bowman, the Fed said, preferred a quarter-point rate cut.
Of the Fed's 19 policymakers who take part in each two-day rate-setting meeting, only 12 cast a vote on the decision. Those include eight permanent voters, including all seven members of the Fed Board and the president of the New York Fed, with the remaining 11 Fed presidents trading off one-year turns at the ballot box in groups of four.
Before 1995 dissents from Fed governors were not infrequent, but since then it has been Fed presidents who have cast the overwhelming majority of the 90-plus dissents in that time period. Fed chairs typically seek consensus on decisions, sometimes reaching compromises to avert open disagreement that could be seen as undercutting their credibility.
"I do think that we’re a consensus-driven organization," Fed Chair Jerome Powell said after the July rate-setting meeting, at which the group reached its 17th straight unanimous rate-setting decision. During the pandemic dissents were infrequent. "We felt more united because we felt under a lot of pressure to get things right," Powell said then, "but before the pandemic, we had plenty of dissents. And dissents happen. It’s part of the process. There’s nothing wrong with dissents, and if it happens, it happens."
Watershed moments in Fed decision-making are, in fact, sometimes marked by dissents.
In June 2022, Kansas City Fed President Esther George cast what until Wednesday had been the most recent dissent. She had argued for a smaller rate hike, but her colleagues opted for a 75-basis-point increase to battle accelerating inflation. It was the first of a string a four such super-sized moves, the rest of which George ended up backing.
Dissents "clearly suggest that they are not suffering from 'group think,'" said ING economist James Knightley before the meeting. "There are lots of risks to balance and (dissent) would suggest tough discussions are being had."
Ahead of the Fed's decision, financial market bets were running in favor of a half-of-a-percentage-point rate cut; analysts at Wall Street firms for the most part expected a quarter-point cut.
Bowman has made a practice of publicly diverging from the majority at the Fed Board over regulatory matters, with frequent and repeated calls for a lighter touch on banks.
Over the past year she also emerged as one of the Fed's most hawkish voices on monetary policy, supporting a higher Fed policy rate for longer than most of her fellow central bankers in order to be sure to fully vanquish inflation. Bowman's dissent on Wednesday was the first by a Fed governor in the hawkish direction - that is, in favor of tighter monetary policy, rather than looser - in nearly 30 years.
Below is a sampling of some notable dissents in recent Fed history.
MOST RECENT | OCCURRED IN | CAST BY |
|---|---|---|
Dovish dissent | June 2022 | Kansas City Fed's Esther George |
Hawkish dissent | March 2022 | St Louis Fed's James Bullard |
Two dissents | Sept 2020 | Dallas Fed's Robert Kaplan, Minneapolis Fed's Neel Kashkari |
Three dissents | Sept 2019 | Bullard, George, Boston Fed's Eric Rosengren |
Fed Governor dissent | Sept 2005 | Marc Olson, who wanted easier policy |
Fed Governor hawkish dissent | Dec 1994 | John LaWare, who wanted tighter policy |
Four dissents | Oct 1992 | Two governors, two presidents |
Five dissents | May 1983 | Two governors, three presidents |
Reporting by Ann Saphir; Editing by Andrea Ricci
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
