Harris' anti-price gouging plan could build on US state law
By Jody Godoy
Aug 16 (Reuters) -As Vice President Kamala Harris focuses on price gouging in her presidential campaign, state laws and laws proposed by her colleagues in the Senate show potential paths for a crackdown on high prices.
The Democratic candidate planned to lay out her anti-price gouging and other economic proposals in a speech in Raleigh, North Carolina, on Friday.
Price gouging laws generally prohibit profiteering during emergencies, but vary widely as to when they apply, said Lindsay Owens, who leads Groundwork Collaborative, an anti-monopoly think tank. Thirty-four states have some form of anti-price gouging law on the books.
"States have been able to use these laws really effectively to prevent companies from exploiting crises to profit," Owens said.
Harris' plan will include "the first-ever federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries," which her campaign says aims to stop big corporations from unfairly exploiting consumers while generating excessive corporate profits.
New York's law, which Owens views as one of the strongest, bans companies from excessively raising prices on consumer staples during an abnormal market disruption. Drugstore chain Walgreens WBA.O settled with the state last year over allegations it jacked up baby formula prices after a recall led to a nationwide shortage in 2022.
New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, accused Walgreens of raising formula prices by 10% after accounting for increased costs — and, in one case, 70% — during the shortage prompted by a recall at major formula maker Abbott Labs ABT.N.
The only existing federal law against price gouging is aimed at preventing profiteering during wartime or other national emergencies. The law bans hoarding designated scarce items for resale at more than the prevailing market price — a term it does not define.
In 2020, when Harris was a U.S. senator, she co-sponsored legislation that would have defined price gouging in an emergency as charging more than 10 percent above the previous average price. The bill built in a defense for sellers that could show price hikes flowed from their own rising costs.
The proposal was modeled after California's anti-price gouging law, which Harris warned businesses against violating when she was the state's attorney general. The state's current attorney general, Rob Bonta, used it to sue a landlord over rent hikes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
While pandemic-era supply problems have eased, consumer advocates and some Democratic legislators have accused corporations of using the pandemic and general inflation as cover for price hikes to boost profits.
Democratic U.S. senators, including Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, introduced a bill earlier this year that would make it illegal to offer goods or services at a "grossly excessive price" — a term the U.S. Federal Trade Commission would define.
A price at least 20% higher than the average market price in the previous six months is one definition the agency would have to consider.
It would also require publicly traded companies to disclose their gross margins and pricing strategies in the wake of an emergency or other unusual market disruption.
While that bill had no Republican sponsors, other pricing bills, such as proposed drug price reforms, have received bipartisan support.
Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa has led the charge on those bills and co-sponsored others aimed at combating the effects of consolidation in the meatpacking industry — an area Harris is expected to highlight in her speech.
Even without additional federal legislation, a potential Harris administration has some existing tools.
The Federal Trade Commission under the Biden administration has already used its existing authority to sue to ask a court to block grocery chain Kroger KR.N $24.6 billion deal to buy rival Albertsons ACI.N, and to launch a study of grocery prices.
Reporting by Jody Godoy in New York; editing by Chris Sanders and Jonathan Oatis
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
