India's top court rejects telcos' plea on dues owed to govt; shares slump
Vodafone Idea, Bharti Airtel owe about $12 bln in dues to govt - ICRA
Vodafone Idea shares closed 19.5% lower on Thursday
Recasts, adds analyst comment in paragraphs 9, 10; adds context throughout
By Aleef Jahan C S and VarunVyas Hebbalalu
BENGALURU, Sept 19 (Reuters) -India's top court on Thursday rejected a request by telecom companies to recalculate the dues they owed the government, sending shares of debt-saddled Vodafone Idea VODA.NS and its peers down.
Analysts at ICRA estimate that Vodafone Idea and Bharti Airtel BRTI.NS owe 1 trillion rupees ($12 billion) in past dues, including spectrum charges and licensing fees. They, however, did not shed light on the amount owed by other companies.
The companies, in a last-resort petition against a similar ruling by the top court in 2021, had argued that the telecom department made errors in calculating the so-called adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues.
Telecom firms had long contested that only revenue accrued from core services should be taken into account when computing the dues, while the government argued that AGR should include non-core revenue as well, such as money from rent or land sales.
The Supreme Court had, in 2019, ruled in favour of the government's definition of AGR calculations.
The latest ruling is a setback for Vodafone Idea, which owes the government around 700 billion rupees in license fees and spectrum charges, according to its latest quarterly report.
The Indian government is also one of the largest shareholders in the company with a 23.1% stake.
Analysts did not expect the ruling to have a major impact on Bharti Airtel due to its stronger financials.
Shares of Vodafone Idea slumped about 20% after the news, while Bharti Airtel BRTI.NS briefly turned negative, but closed0.6% higher.
"A positive ruling would have reduced Vodafone's debt by 350 billion rupees," said Balaji Subramanian, a research analyst at IIFL Securities.
The ruling makes Vodafone's debt-funding (250 bln rupee) challenging since lesser cash flow would worry banks about taking exposure to the company, he said.
"If the relief had come, their annual cash flow would be higher by 80 billion rupees."
Vodafone Idea and Bharti Airtel did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment.
($1 = 83.6180 Indian rupees)
Reporting by Aleef Jahan in Bengaluru, Arpan Chaturvedi in New Delhi; Editing by Nivedita Bhattacharjee and Varun H K
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
