Third US proxy advisory firm urges end of News Corp's dual-class voting structure
Adds details on Egan-Jones rating firm, background, paragraphs 1-2 and 5-6
Egan-Jones and Glass Lewis back recapitalization plan
Murdoch family owns 14% stake but controls 41% of votes
News Corp argues dual-class structure protects editorial integrity
By Svea Herbst-Bayliss
NEW YORK, Nov 5 (Reuters) -Two U.S. proxy advisory firms on Tuesday urged News Corp NWSA.O investors to support a hedge fund's campaign to change the company's dual-class share structure, saying no investor should have voting rights that are different from others.
Egan-Jones and its bigger rival Glass Lewis recommended investors back a recapitalization plan at the company's Nov. 20 meeting where all stock would have one vote for one share. They join prominent proxy advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) which last week urged News Corp investors to do the same.
Voting for the nonbinding shareholder proposal, which was made by hedge fund Starboard Value, would be a signal that investors are intent on breaking Rupert Murdoch's control over the media empire that publishes the Wall Street Journal.
"The economic stake of each shareholder should match their voting power and ... no small group of shareholders, family or otherwise, should have voting rights different from those of other shareholders," Glass Lewis wrote in its report which was seen by Reuters.
In its report, seen by Reuters, Egan-Jones wrote: "A one vote per share principle would provide an equitable approach to ensure that shareholders are given a fair voice that is proportionate to their stake in the Company and would be able to hold the management accountable of their actions through casting a vote."
The two recommendations, issued on Tuesday, come just days after the largest U.S. proxy advisory firm, ISS, threw its weight behind Starboard Value. Starboard, the activist investment firm run by Jeffrey Smith submitted a nonbinding proposal to eliminate dual-class share structure, Reuters reported in September.
Murdoch and his family own a 14% economic stake in the company but control 41% of the votes.
News Corp has urged investors to vote against Starboard's proposal. The company has argued the dual-class capital structure provides key protections for editorial integrity.
Australian governance advisory firm Ownership Matters also recommended that investors vote for the Starboard proposal. Roughly 15% of the voting shares are held in Australia and Ownership Matters is a key proxy advisory firm in the country.
Glass Lewis noted that Starboard, and other hedge funds, have also criticized News Corp for its financial performance and wrote that if the dual-class structure were eliminated, the board could potentially face a proxy fight that would likely focus "squarely on the historical performance of News Corp."
The company could take actions to address investors' valuation concerns but keep its dual-class structure even in the face of governance best practices, the report said.
Reporting by Svea Herbst-Bayliss in New York
Editing by Marguerita Choy and Matthew Lewis
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
