Tupperware lenders oppose company's proposed bankruptcy sale
By Dietrich Knauth
NEW YORK, Sept 19 (Reuters) -Tupperware's lenders opposed the food storage and kitchen products company's proposed bankruptcy auction during the company's first court appearance, cutting off its access to cash and threatening to derail the company's bankruptcy plans.
The Orlando, Florida-based company filed for bankruptcy protection late Tuesday, with $818 million in debt and a plan to find a buyer within 30 days.
But three key lenders, Alden Global Capital, Stonehill Institutional Partners and a trading desk of Bank of America, which bought Tupperware debt with a face value of $450 million in July, quickly opposed the company's plans.
They took the rare steps of cutting off its access to $7.4 million in its bank accounts and filing a motion to dismiss the bankruptcy or convert it to a Chapter 7 liquidation that would allow lenders to quickly seize the company without the time and expense of a lengthy Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
The lenders' attorney, Allan Brilliant of Dechert, said at a court hearing in Wilmington, Delaware, that the company's bankruptcy strategy would simply drag out the company's failed search for a buyer.
Tupperware has spent $67 million since January 2023 on restructuring and marketing professionals, but the highest bid was just 20% of the company's existing $818 million in debt, according to the lenders' court filings.
"They hope to convince Your Honor that they could sell to some third party rather than the lenders, but the reality is that that's just not going to happen here,” Brilliant told U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Brendan Shannon, who is overseeing the case.
Tupperware resisted the lenders' attempt to quickly foreclose on its assets after that purchase, instead believing that it should be allowed to conduct an open and transparent sale of its assets in a court-supervised bankruptcy proceeding, according to the company's attorney, Spencer Winters of Kirkland & Ellis.
Winters pointed out that the objecting lenders had only recently acquired a controlling stake in the company's debt for between $15 million and $30 million. That investment is far less than the bids that the lenders now portray as unrealistically low.
Brilliant said that the amount his clients paid for the debt was irrelevant.
Tupperware intends to ask Shannon to restore its access to cash accounts at a court hearing next week.
Tupperware attributed its bankruptcy to a years-long slump in sales, saying it relied too heavily on independent sales representatives instead of selling online or in retail stores.
The case is In Re Tupperware Brands Corp, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, No. 24-12156.
For Tupperware: Spencer Winters of Kirkland & Ellis
For the ad hoc group of lenders: Allan Brilliant of Dechert
Read more:
Tupperware - from a US household brand to an indebted kitchenware maker
Tupperware files for bankruptcy as its colorful containers lose relevance
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
