XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

US SEC to allow exchanges to quote sub-penny prices in bid to boost competition



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>US SEC to allow exchanges to quote sub-penny prices in bid to boost competition</title></head><body>

By Douglas Gillison

Sept 18 (Reuters) -Wall Street's top regulator on Wednesday is set to adopt new rules for pricing stocks at less than a penny, part of a larger package of proposed reforms that could constitute the biggest overhaul of U.S. equity markets in nearly 20 years if completed.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule change permitting stock exchanges to quote prices in sub-penny increments would promote more competitive pricing for the stocks now constituting the majority of trading volumes, according to the agency.

The five SEC commissioners are due to convene at 10 a.m. ET (1400 GMT) to vote on the proposal first unveiled in December 2022. Though the SEC is often sharply divided on political lines, the commissioners unanimously proposed the pricing changes.

They will also consider a related change reducing the amount stock exchanges can charge for access to their markets, which officials say is necessary to prevent price distortions if price increments are reduced.

In announcing the proposal in 2022, SEC Chair Gary Gensler said the changes would help level the playing field between exchanges and dark markets.

Gensler has said disparities in on-exchange and off-exchange quotes, or "tick sizes", has helped drive nearly half of all trades off exchanges. Smaller tick sizes are attractive to investors because they narrow the spread, thereby allowing a better deal.

The debate over the growth of off-exchange trading, long a hot topic in the U.S. markets, was reignited by the 2021 GameStop GME.N trading fiasco, which highlighted the dominance of market makers like Citadel Securities in dark retail markets.

In public comments, Citadel Securities initially denounced the SEC's reform proposals, arguing the tick sizes proposal threatened the stability and efficiency of markets by reducing liquidity and driving investor panic in times of turbulence.

Citadel and other firms including Charles Schwab SCHW.N and NYSE ICE.N have pushed for a minimum increment of half a penny, unlike the four-tiered system initially proposed by the SEC, which included increments of as little as a tenth of a penny.

Other industry participants said in comments that excessively small price increments risk promoting "queue jumping," when buyers jump ahead of existing orders by making only fractionally higher bids, among other possible drawbacks.

The SEC has not yet disclosed the final version of the rule set to be adopted later on Wednesday.

Industry players have urged the SEC to proceed cautiously before finalizing the rest of its December 2022 market structure package, including a proposal to put stock orders up for auctions and a "best execution" standard for brokers and dealers in stocks and government bonds.

"They're dealing with the less controversial ones first," said James Angel, a professor at Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business.



Reporting by Douglas Gillison in Washington; Additional reporting by Laura Matthews in New York; Editing by Jamie Freed

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.