US Supreme Court won't hear 5-Hour Energy drink pricing case
By Mike Scarcella
Oct. 7(Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear 5-Hour Energy drink maker Living Essentials’ challenge to a lawsuit claiming it gave discounts to retail giant Costco that undercut other wholesalers.
The justices turned away Living Essentials’ appeal of a lower court's decision last year that said the wholesalers could sue to level the playing field for the popular energy shot.
The Supreme Court issued its order without comment, and the wholesalers’ case will now return to the federal district court in Los Angeles, where the lawsuit was filed in 2018 against Living Essentials and its parent company Innovation Ventures.
Living Essentials and attorneys for the wholesalers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Costco, which was not a defendant in the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The plaintiffs, including U.S. Wholesale Outlet & Distribution and other sellers, said they competed with Costco for retail sales of 5-Hour Energy drinks, which come in small bottles and give users a jolt of caffeine.
They accused Living Essentials of violating the Robinson-Patman Act, a U.S. antitrust law that broadly forbids a company from charging different prices for the same product to two or more competitors.
Living Essentials countered that Costco was a retailer and not a rival to the wholesalers, and so the price discrimination law should not apply.
A U.S. judge agreed with Living Essentials, but a panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year overturned the lower court ruling.
Living Essentials argued in a filing at the Supreme Court that the appeals court order threatened to expose more companies to liability over price discounts.
The case is Innovation Ventures and Living Essentials et al v. U.S. Wholesale Outlet & Distributors et al, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 23-1099.
For petitioners: David Frederick of Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick
For respondents: Mark Poe of Gaw Poe
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
