Some US Steel appeal would survive busted deal
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Jonathan Guilford
NEW YORK, Sept 12 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Insufficient heat can interrupt the welding process, but U.S. Steel’s X.N problem has been too much of it. Fiery nationalistic and labor backlash is preventing the 123-year-old company from fusing with Japanese peer Nippon Steel 5401.T, as leery U.S. security regulators look set to nix the $15 billion deal. Although boss David Burritt may be forced to mold his metal-maker differently, there are ways to keep it relatively strong.
The fight over U.S. Steel offers a microcosm of an industry-wide one. More carbon-intensive blast furnaces produce steel of better quality. And even though, say, the smooth surfaces of car panels are tougher for newer electric arc furnaces, they’re catching up – and with better economics. At less than 10%, anticipated full-year EBITDA margins for U.S. Steel and blast-furnace rival Cleveland-Cliffs CLF.N lag the 15% at more advanced Nucor NUE.N and Steel Dynamics STLD.O, according to Visible Alpha.
Electric now accounts for 68% of U.S. production, the World Steel Association says. U.S. Steel chased this shift, acquiring Big River Steel a few years ago, before plowing $3.4 billion into an expansion project dubbed BR2.
The problem: the investment incinerated free cash flow. U.S. Steel is expected to burn through more than $700 million of it this year, Visible Alpha estimates show. Steel prices surged through the pandemic, but they’ve receded again. Expectations for the company’s blast-furnace-segment EBITDA for 2024 have tumbled 35% since February. Some facilities sit idle, others need costly overhauls.
Small wonder that Burritt accepted Nippon’s $55-a-share offer in December. The price exceeds the mid-$20s where it formerly languished. It also hands over responsibility for a difficult strategic transition and a strained relationship with the United Steelworkers union representing blast-furnace employees. Non-union Big River ate up the capital once earmarked for unionized mills.
Nippon is making last-ditch efforts to salvage the transaction from being rejected by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which screens inbound takeovers. If it can’t, however, all is not lost for Burritt.
U.S. Steel’s metamorphosis holds immense promise despite likely job losses and other downsides from a deal collapse. Its electric business already produces superior margins to the rest of the company. Put the unit’s expected 2025 EBITDA on Nucor’s multiple of around 7 times and the rest on the 5 times at which Cleveland-Cliffs trades, and U.S. Steel is worth nearly $11 billion, including debt. It’s less than Nippon is willing to pay for control, but it’s also 11% higher than where it’s valued now. Big River also offers additional upside, an indication of fresh ways to strike when the iron is hot.
Follow @JMAGuilford on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Nippon Steel Vice Chair Takahiro Mori was due to meet on Sept. 11 with U.S. officials from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to push for approval of the company’s agreed acquisition of U.S. Steel, the Financial Times reported, citing unnamed sources.
U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration is moving toward blocking the deal, Reuters reported on Sept. 4, also citing unnamed sources. The combination, unveiled on Dec. 18, 2023, values U.S. Steel at $55 a share.
Lourenco Goncalves, the chief executive of U.S. steelmaking rival Cleveland-Cliffs, preemptively congratulated the administration on Sept. 5 for intervening, adding that his company “stands ready” to buy any union-represented assets that U.S. Steel may shut down. U.S. Steel CEO David Burritt has said his company may have to close mills and move its headquarters if the Nippon Steel deal falls through.
Graphic: US steel prices have given up their Covid-19 booster https://reut.rs/4gm3qIG
Graphic: US Steel's capital spending has shifted dramatically https://reut.rs/3AVCaR6
Editing by Jeffrey Goldfarb and Sharon Lam
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
