Kroger-Albertson's US anti-trust trial to end but other legal blocks loom
By Jody Godoy
Sept 17 (Reuters) -The trial where U.S. anti-trust regulators made theircase to block Kroger's KR.N $25 billion bid to buy rival grocer Albertsons ACI.N will conclude on Tuesday, but the deal's legal challenges have just begun, with two more trials this month to hear complaints the merger could jack up grocery bills.
For the past three weeks, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and a coalition of states havesought to prove at trial in Portland, Oregon, that the deal would harm shoppers and unionized grocery workers.
By the time that case concludes on Tuesday, the companies will be on day two of another trial in Seattle where Washington state's attorney general is challenging the deal. Beginning on Sept. 30, a judge in Denver will hear Colorado's arguments for stopping the deal.
"It's a notable increase in the cost, stretches out the timeline, and is an unwelcome additional collection of obstacles" for the companies, said William Kovacic, an antitrust professor at George Washington University.
Kroger and Albertsons have spent $864 million in merger costs this year, and theyoppose allthree cases. Kroger says the merger will result in lower prices and higher wages.
"Only global, non-unionized giants like Walmart, Amazon and Costco will benefit from this deal being blocked," the company said in a statement.
In Washington state, where Attorney General Bob Ferguson went to trial to block the deal on Monday, half of all grocery sales flow through one of the two chains, and 124 stores are slated to shift to C&S if the merger proceeds.
In addition to arguing the deal will raise prices and diminish choices for shoppers, Ferguson has argued it will make it easier for Kroger to close stores where workers are unionized and reopen them as non-union.
"We look forward to standing up for Washingtonians in Washington state court," Ferguson said in a statement.
Colorado, too, has sued to block the merger over concerns from shoppers, workers and local farmers who supply both chains.
"Colorado cares about having local food. And that is an area where these two companies compete against each other. It's important to farmers," Attorney General Phil Weiser said in a recent interview.
At the Oregon trial that began on Aug. 26, the FTC and a coalition of eight states plus Washington, D.C. called grocery executives, union leaders and economists as witnesses to try to show the deal is likely to drive up prices and diminish workers' bargaining power by eliminating head-to-head competition between the two chains.
The two grocers sought to show the deal was necessary to lower prices at Albertsons stores and enable both chains to compete with Walmart.
Kroger has said no stores will be closed as a result of the merger. But that would not prevent stores being closed or consolidated down the road.
Reporting by Jody Godoy in New York, additional reporting by Deborah Bloom in Portland, Oregon; Editing by David Gregorio
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
